<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thumbs Up on Broadlook Diver</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.therecruiterslounge.com/2007/08/12/thumbs-up-on-broadlook-diver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.therecruiterslounge.com/2007/08/12/thumbs-up-on-broadlook-diver/</link>
	<description>Exploring the wacky world of employment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:47:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joshi</title>
		<link>http://www.therecruiterslounge.com/2007/08/12/thumbs-up-on-broadlook-diver/comment-page-1/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>joshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therecruiterslounge.com/?p=1076#comment-567</guid>
		<description>Hi ,

This software really looks very good,  however scared it will not pull our data from our system or database.

Regards,

Joshi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi ,</p>
<p>This software really looks very good,  however scared it will not pull our data from our system or database.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Joshi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Gutmacher</title>
		<link>http://www.therecruiterslounge.com/2007/08/12/thumbs-up-on-broadlook-diver/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Gutmacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therecruiterslounge.com/?p=1076#comment-566</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve given them some constructive feedback.  Short version: it doesn&#039;t pull address fields (street, city, state, zip), which you&#039;d expect for a resume search product.  As of now, it&#039;s better for non-resume people search. I would recommend you give them strings for that instead, because the product&#039;s built-in examples for non-resume search are problematic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve given them some constructive feedback.  Short version: it doesn&#8217;t pull address fields (street, city, state, zip), which you&#8217;d expect for a resume search product.  As of now, it&#8217;s better for non-resume people search. I would recommend you give them strings for that instead, because the product&#8217;s built-in examples for non-resume search are problematic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
