<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google vs Microsoft: Who would you rather work for?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.therecruiterslounge.com/2007/06/28/google-vs-microsoft-who-would-you-rather-work-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.therecruiterslounge.com/2007/06/28/google-vs-microsoft-who-would-you-rather-work-for/</link>
	<description>Exploring the wacky world of employment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:47:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Sweet</title>
		<link>http://www.therecruiterslounge.com/2007/06/28/google-vs-microsoft-who-would-you-rather-work-for/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Sweet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 20:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therecruiterslounge.com/?p=981#comment-468</guid>
		<description>Just because I&#039;m being ornery (that&#039;s a Texan word...) today, allow me to make another comparison:

The benefits, work conditions, work availability, and pay are much worse as an actor than as a librarian.  But there still a shortage of librarians and no shortage of actors.

Why do you think that might be?

I always think it&#039;s ironic to hear these stories coming out of Microsoft.  For those who can remember, Microsoft was the same way back in the early-to-mid 90&#039;s.  Less pay, worse hours, crappy vesting schedule, and Kool-Aid drinking was a requirement to work there.  And, yet, people were flocking to work there.

Times change, eh?

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because I&#8217;m being ornery (that&#8217;s a Texan word&#8230;) today, allow me to make another comparison:</p>
<p>The benefits, work conditions, work availability, and pay are much worse as an actor than as a librarian.  But there still a shortage of librarians and no shortage of actors.</p>
<p>Why do you think that might be?</p>
<p>I always think it&#8217;s ironic to hear these stories coming out of Microsoft.  For those who can remember, Microsoft was the same way back in the early-to-mid 90&#8217;s.  Less pay, worse hours, crappy vesting schedule, and Kool-Aid drinking was a requirement to work there.  And, yet, people were flocking to work there.</p>
<p>Times change, eh?</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
